Today, in the House, there will be an attempt at overriding Governor Markell’s veto of House Bill 50, Parent Opt Out bill. I will be voting yes to the override. House Bill 50 originally passed the House 36 Yes, 3 No (Barbieri, Dukes, and Jaques) and 2 absent. I don’t agree with the Governor vetoing House Bill 50 and his reasons behind his veto. I am for useful assessments; assessments that will provide meaningful data that can be used to direct resources to our schools, to our classrooms and to individual students. I am hopeful that my colleagues in the House will join me in overriding House Bill 50 veto today!
Tag Archives: Opt Out
What’s going on in Dover this week!
Today, David Bentz was sworn in as the State Representative representing the 18th District, he replaces Rep. Mike Barbieri. Former Rep. Barbieri stepped down from his seat during the summer to become the new director of the Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health.
Tomorrow, House Bill 186, charter audit bill, will be heard in the Senate Education Committee, I am hopeful it will be released from the committee. We have seen the abuse that has taken place with some of our charter schools using taxpayer funds inappropriately. Currently, charter schools hire their own auditors, they are not required by law to go through the State Auditor’s Office. All Delaware school districts including votechs go through the State Auditor’s Office for their audits.
Thursday, Rep. Kowalko will attempt to override Governor Markell veto on House Bill 50, Opt Out bill.
Letter from State PTA to Delaware Legislators asking Them to Support House Bill 50 Veto Override
Happy New Year. As you begin the new legislative session, I would like to share the number one thing that is weighing on parent’s minds this year; the ability for a parent’s right to choose to opt out of the state assessment, SBAC.
Delaware PTA is very aware that the way the law reads now they can opt out however, they do so with a fear of repercussions and penalties for their children and their children’s schools. They do so with no protection from threats. They do so with no guarantee of constructive instruction while other students test. Parents want to exercise choices when it comes to their children’s education. Our membership of over 8000 finds no value in SBAC. We appreciate the assessment inventory task force however, did you know there is no PTA representative on this task force. There is no representation solely of parents. How can this be permitted? So we, as parents, turn to you to make this right.
As an aside, Delaware PTA is not opposed to assessments. We understand they are necessary to measure the progress of our children. However, SBAC is not a valid growth measure, does not inform instruction, and the results are received by parents after their child begins a new school year and is promoted. These are just a few reasons we do not support the use of SBAC.
Parents want the choice of opting their children out of the the state assessment. This is something you all voted on and it was passed by a majority vote in The House last Spring. That was the democratic process at work. The Senate then voted to pass the bill. The veto by Governor Markell was disrespectful to the democratic process. The people spoke, but the Governor did not listen. When HB#50 passed there were hundreds of your constituents all thrilled that you listened to their voices.Thank you for that. Now it is time to listen to them again. Please make this right by voting to override the Governor’s veto of HB#50
With all due respect to Governor Markell, he ignored the voice of the parents, and quite frankly of the General Assembly. It is wrong on so many levels. I am confident you will make this right. We are asking all of you to vote in favor for first, suspending the rules and second , in favor of an override of the veto of HB#50.
Delaware PTA will be presenting a petition signed by hundreds of parents from up and down Delaware this Thursday Jan 14, 2016. We would like to invite each of to join us at a rally on the steps of Legislative Hall at 1 pm that same day. We invite you to listen to the voices of parents and to speak if you so choose on this issue.
Yvonne Johnson
National PTA Board of Directors
Immediate Past President Delaware PTA
VP for Advocacy Delaware PTA
Region VP for Red Clay ( acting)
State President’s Club Secretary/Treasurer
T- 302-753-7107
yjohnson@delawarepta.org
The Washington Post article chimes in about DE Parents Opting Out and the needed data!
I am a parent of two DE public school children, I am a former DE PTA president, a former Red Clay school board member, I am currently a DE State Representative and Vice Chair of the House Education Committee. I found this article to be quite interesting. The writers of this piece truly do not understand what is going on here in Delaware regarding the current state assessment and the ignored and meaningless data that is produced from it.
The Washington Post article states that opting out “undermines the collection of the needed data.” I find that sentence just fascinating! I wonder if the authors of this piece understand that the needed data comes after the student has moved on to the next grade level. The needed data arrived in the mail addressed to the parent after their child moved on to the next grade or moved up to another school. If the parent had questions about the needed data, who should the parent talk to -the student’s new teacher who just started teaching the student or last year’s teacher who is teaching new students? Do the writers understand that this test which produces the needed data does not measure growth?
In the article Governor Markell states, “Assessments are an important tool for teachers and families to have.” I would agree, if these assessments were a useful tool. If the assessment gave meaningful data to a teacher immediately on individually students, I would agree. My question to the writers, how is this a useful tool if the test comes seven months later, after the student has been promoted to the next grade? What are we learning from this needed data? Is the state developing educational programs from this needed data or are we just going to continue to label schools with this needed data? Are we going to continue to tell communities that your school is failing with this needed data? Are we going to tell these communities that we are going to continue to collect the needed data for another 20 years ignoring what we already know that we do not properly fund what the needed data has been telling us for years -that there is no funding for ELL students, we do not fund Basic Special Education Kindergarten through 3rd grade, and that we have been ignoring poverty since the needed data has been collected? So why would anyone continue to support this state assessment when the needed data has been screaming at us for years what our state needs? These are the questions these folks from The Washington Post should have asked the Governor instead of telling Delaware parents it is not ok to opt out!
Delaware should not make it okay for parents to opt their kids out of testing
SAT to replace Smarter in 11th grade in Delaware, less testing is a good thing but are there unintended consequences?
The SAT will replace the Smarter Assessment as the state test for high school juniors beginning this spring.
Sign the Petition Supporting the Override of Delaware HB50 Veto – Opt Out Bill
Please take a minute to sign the petition, I signed it and I hope you will as well.
Sign the petition to override Delaware House Bill 50 Veto.
The below was taken from the Delaware PTA Petition page.
It is a parent’s fundamental right to direct the education and upbringing of their children!
HB 50 was legislation sponsored by Rep John Kowalko which provided a consistent process to allow Delaware parents to opt their child(ren) out of the Smarter Balanced Assessment without fear of punishment or reprisal from district and school administration. The Bill also required meaningful academic instruction for those students not participating in the test. In its simplest form, HB 50 would secure a parent’s right to opt their child(ren) out of the assessment if they believe it is in the best interest of their child. The Bill acknowledged the parent’s right to protect their child from unnecessary and harmful tests. At its core, HB 50 was proposed legislation that would place students first.
With an overwhelming majority (86% in the House and 71% in the Senate), the bill passed at the end of June. Yet, despite the vote of the General Assembly and the strong public support expressed for HB 50 by educators through DSEA, parents and families, the state PTA, and school administrations the Governor vetoed this bill.
HB 50 was, and is, not about one specific test – the Smarter Balanced Assessment, despite what opponents would suggest. Supporters of the bill are not suggesting or encouraging parents to opt out of state assessments, whether it’s the SBA or another assessment. Rather, we believe this is the right of the family and a decision that should be left in the capable hands of parents to decide what is best for their children.
Delaware PTA, as well as the majority of HB 50 supporters, is not, and never has been anti-assessment. We support standardized tests, if they are limited, developmentally appropriate and provide useful instructional feedback. The Smarter Balanced Assessment does none of this. Assessments, regardless of which one is used, have to be judged against their intended uses. The SBAC was not designed to meet the needs of students and teachers; it was designed to meet the needs of the state, to allow state level and inter-consortia comparisons of student performance. For years parents and teachers were led to believe that No Child Left Behind and Race To The Top initiatives would help identify at risk students and schools, allowing state officials to direct resources and supports to our most neediest schools in an attempt to reduce the achievement gap. In fact, all that has happened under these initiatives were attempts to label, punish and close our schools. Yet, we are to believe that the new Smarter Balanced Assessments will do more than prior assessments and initiatives, and that the Smarter Balanced Assessments are necessary to reduce the achievement gap.
However, regardless of our beliefs about the Smarter Balanced Assessment, the issue at hand is the parent’s right. Current state code does not contain any language that prohibits the parent/guardians from opting their student out of the state assessment. Many school and district officials have already confirmed that they cannot and will not force a student to participate in the assessment. HB 50 simply codifies this – ensuring that the decision maintains the parent’s.
Reminder: Red Clay School Board Meeting – October 21st – 7:00 – Conrad
Red Clay School Board Meeting – October 21 7:00 at Conrad Schools of Science.
- There will be a presentation on WEIC.
- Finalizing Mascot Committee, click here for more information.
- Delaware College Prep and DMA charter renewals are up and they are both requesting charter modifications.
- DMA is requesting an increase in enrollment to 715 cadets by the year 2021. This would begin in 2017-2018 and would amount to 36 cadets
- DCP is requesting a decrease in their enrollment 300 to 255
- Increase the number of K-2 classrooms
- Adjust the attrition rate from 7% to 15%
- Enroll scholars in Grades 3-5
- Clarify DCPA’s two-teacher model (one teacher, one para)
- Align DCPA’s school year with local districts
- Allow for a model of co-leadership at DCPA
- Policy Opt-Out 7015 – Click here to view policy.
Red Clay School Board Meeting – October 21st – 7:00 – Conrad
Red Clay School Board Meeting – October 21 7:00 at Conrad Schools of Science.
- There will be a presentation on WEIC.
- Finalizing Mascot Committee, click here for more information.
- Delaware College Prep and DMA charter renewals are up and they are both requesting charter modifications.
- DMA is requesting an increase in enrollment to 715 cadets by the year 2021. This would begin in 2017-2018 and would amount to 36 cadets
- DCP is requesting a decrease in their enrollment 300 to 255
- Increase the number of K-2 classrooms
- Adjust the attrition rate from 7% to 15%
- Enroll scholars in Grades 3-5
- Clarify DCPA’s two-teacher model (one teacher, one para)
- Align DCPA’s school year with local districts
- Allow for a model of co-leadership at DCPA
- Policy Opt-Out 7015 – Click here to view policy.